Author ORCID Identifier
Semester
Spring
Date of Graduation
2025
Document Type
Dissertation
Degree Type
PhD
College
Eberly College of Arts and Sciences
Department
Sociology and Anthropology
Committee Chair
Katie Corcoran
Committee Co-Chair
Rachel Stein
Committee Member
Chris Scheitle
Committee Member
Bradley Price
Committee Member
Andrew Whitehead
Abstract
In 2016, the Amish PAC was formed with the intent of mobilizing a group of low propensity voters who they believed could help secure political victory in critical swing states such as Ohio and Pennsylvania. These efforts continued through the 2020 election as the PAC continued to court voters within a closed religious community in an attempt to encourage political activity amongst those who ideologically remain apolitical. Specifically, this mobilization effort targeted those within the Amish and Mennonite communities, discussed throughout this dissertation as the ‘Plain Community’. This dissertation analyzes the mobilization attempt by measuring changes in the way the Plain Community engages in national politics through written discourse. I hypothesized that the mobilization attempts will cause a change in the frequency of political discourse that occurs within the Plain Community newspaper, The Budget. Published weekly, The Budget is a correspondence newspaper that is comprised primarily of entries from scribes scattered throughout the United States. To test this hypothesis, I use a mixed methods approach that incorporates topic modeling through Natural Language Processing, z-tests for proportions, and content analysis to assess the differences in political discourse across time. In total, I analyzed over 112,000 entries from 2008, 2012, 2016, and 2020. The findings from this dissertation indicate that the mobilization efforts from outside groups impact the frequency of political discussions within the closed religious community. However, mobilization seems to occur across all entries, and not simply those within states most heavily targeted by the Amish PAC. I uncovered more nuance within the data by conducting a content analysis of entries identified as political. More specifically, the content analysis uncovered differences in how the community discussed political figures based on gender and race, integrated misinformation into their written correspondence and discussed their personal responsibility for the nation’s wellbeing. These findings are contextualized within the broader theoretical landscape of religion and politics in the United States.
Recommended Citation
Guthrie, Sara K., "Permeability of Politics: Exploring the Impact of Mobilization on Political Discussions in a Closed Religious Community" (2025). Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports. 12748.
https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/12748