Author ORCID Identifier
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
11-6-2022
College/Unit
Eberly College of Arts and Sciences
Department/Program/Center
Geology and Geography
Abstract
Staying within manageable global temperature rise scenarios (i.e., 1.5° C) requires rapid decarbonization of energy sources. Research on the energy transition typically focuses on engineering, socioeconomic, and political challenges related to implementation of renewable energy technologies. Yet many facets of the energy transition are intricately intertwined with earth surface processes. Projects that advance the energy transition affect surface hydrology, sediment transport, and landscape evolution. Geomorphic processes likewise set the feasibility of energy transition projects. Here I use the lens of a recent policy debate to examine a case study that illustrates the key role of surface processes in determining the geomorphic impact and feasibility of the energy transition: the potential for conversion of agricultural land to photovoltaic arrays to drive soil erosion and water quality degradation. I point to open research questions that will result in both basic science advances and improved policy outcomes arising from effective geomorphic assessment of potential solar development. Zooming out from this case study, I suggest that there are significant environmental benefits to be gained by integrating earth surface processes research into planning for – and realizing – the transition to sustainable energy.
Digital Commons Citation
Shobe, Charles, "How Impervious are Solar Arrays? On the Need for Geomorphic Assessment of Energy Transition Technologies" (2022). Faculty & Staff Scholarship. 3274.
https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/faculty_publications/3274
Source Citation
Shobe, C.M. (2022) How impervious are solar arrays? On the need for geomorphic assessment of energy transition technologies. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 47(14), 3219– 3223. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.5489.
Included in
Geomorphology Commons, Natural Resources and Conservation Commons, Natural Resources Management and Policy Commons, Soil Science Commons, Sustainability Commons, Water Resource Management Commons
Comments
This journal prohibits uploading the typeset version. This is the accepted version, which differs from the final, typeset version of record that can be found here: https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.5489.