Document Type


Publication Date



This article examines the perhaps unintended consequences of changing legal doctrine. Most commentary on the U.S. Supreme Court Parents Involved in Community Schools (“PICS”) decision explores PICS’ impact upon voluntary race-based policies to remedy unintentional de facto racial segregation. In contrast, this analysis explores PICS’ impact upon mandatory race-based policies to remedy government-sponsored de jure racial segregation. After PICS, the Fourteenth Amendment’s essence and character can turn on a finding of unitary status, a purely factual and somewhat subjective determination reviewable only for clear error. Under the Equal Protection Clause, a school district found to operate a de jure segregated school system may be forced to use race-based policies to undo the effects of such segregation. The instant, however, that a district judge signs the court order granting that school district unitary status, the Equal Protection Clause then forbids the school district from using the identical race-based policies to address the effects of de facto segregation. PICS thus has injected into the Equal Protection Clause’s schizophrenic identity a never-before-seen wrinkle called a pivot point.The pivot point arises when school systems constitutionally required to use race-based policies to remedy de jure segregation become constitutionally prohibited from using the same race-based policies to address de facto segregation voluntarily. After exploring PICS’ effect on de jure school systems’ legal obligations, we explore the ramifications of a constitutional standard that abruptly transforms legal obligations on the basis of a subjective factual determination. This pivot point may induce bizarre effects in familiar legal processes, with unpredictable consequences. In its zeal to alter Brown v. Board of Education’s legacy, the PICS majority overlooked the structural impact of its decision on de jure systems governed by a very different vision of the Equal Protection Clause. The resulting pivot point is a testament to the dangers of parsing individual rights too finely at the expense of maintaining stability in legal structure and process.

Source Citation

Fischbach, Jonathan D., Rhee, Will., & Cacace, Robert. (2008). Race At The Pivot Point: The Future Of Race-Based Policies To Remedy De Jure Segregation After Parents Involved In Community Schools. Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review, (1).



To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.