Author ORCID Identifier

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1972-2348

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8167-5936

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5711-3514

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5525-943X

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0138-7545

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0974-4009

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6270-9678

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9291-6328

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

10-9-2021

College/Unit

School of Public Health

Department/Program/Center

Social and Behavioral Sciences

Abstract

Background: Rural US communities experience health disparities, including a lower prevalence of physical activity (PA). However, “Positive Deviants”—rural communities with greater PA than their peers—exist. The purpose of this study was to identify the factors that help create physically active rural US communities. Methods: Stakeholder interviews, on-site intercept interviews, and in-person observations were used to form a comparative case study of two rural counties with high PA prevalence (HPAs) and one with low PA prevalence (LPA) from a southern US state, selected based on rurality and adult PA prevalence. Interview transcripts were inductively coded by three readers, resulting in a thematic structure that aligned with a Community Capital Framework, which was then used for deductive coding and analysis. Results: Fifteen stakeholder interviews, nine intercept interviews, and on-site observations were conducted. Human and Organizational Capital differed between the HPAs and LPA, manifesting as Social, Built, Financial, and Political Capital differences and a possible “spiraling-up” or cyclical effect through increasing PA and health (Human Capital), highlighting a potential causal model for future study. Conclusions: Multi-organizational PA coalitions may hold promise for rural PA by directly influencing Human and Organizational Capital in the short term and the other forms of capital in the long term.

Source Citation

Abildso, C.G.; Perry, C.K.; Jacobs, L.; Umstattd Meyer, M.R.; McClendon, M.; Edwards, M.B.; Roemmich, J.N.; Ramsey, Z.; Stout, M. What Sets Physically Active Rural Communities Apart from Less Active Ones? A Comparative Case Study of Three US Counties. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 10574. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182010574

Comments

© 2021 Abildso et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

This article received support from the WVU Libraries' Open Access Author Fund.

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.