•  
  •  
 
West Virginia Law Review

Document Type

Editorial Note

Abstract

So much has been written for the law reviews about the doctrine of Swift v. Tyson that it has become a part of the etiquette of the business to explain oneself before adding to the overgrown literature of the subject. It is now nearly a century since this nationalistic doctrine was written into our case law. There has been some vacillation and even more confusion in its exposition but in the large it has steadily become more deeply entrenched and more widely applied in the teeth of the persistent and highly critical opposition of legal writers. But now, in a day of unparalleled nationalism, the Supreme Court has had occasion to impose a definite check upon the further extension of the doctrine. That event calls for comment. It is not the purpose of, this note to consider all of the ramifications of Swift v. Tyson. A brief review of its major implications will suffice.

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.