Document Type
Student Note
Abstract
Two fundamental restrictions limit the permissible scope of the cross-examination of a party litigant or defendant in a jury trial. One is the evidentiary restriction limiting cross-examination to those matters discussed in chief, and the second is the constitutional privilege against compulsory self-incrimination. The purpose of this note is to examine the development and application of these restrictions in West Virginia jurisprudence.
Recommended Citation
Lee A. Luce,
The Scope of Permissible Cross-Examination of a Party Litigant or Defendant in a Jury Trial in West Virginia,
66
W. Va. L. Rev.
(1964).
Available at:
https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/wvlr/vol66/iss4/5