Author ORCID Identifier
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3945-5208
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9470-3799
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9564-0200
N/A
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9047-2030
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5253-9049
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2017
College/Unit
Eberly College of Arts and Sciences
Department/Program/Center
Biochemistry
Abstract
Numerous concerns have been raised about the sustainability of the biomedical research enterprise in the United States. Improving the postdoctoral training experience is seen as a priority in addressing these concerns, but even identifying who the postdocs are is made difficult by the multitude of different job titles they can carry. Here, we summarize the detrimental effects that current employment structures have on training, compensation and benefits for postdocs, and argue that academic research institutions should standardize the categorization and treatment of postdocs. We also present brief case studies of two institutions that have addressed these challenges and can provide models for other institutions attempting to enhance their postdoctoral workforces and improve the sustainability of the biomedical research enterprise.
Digital Commons Citation
Schaller, Michale D.; McDowell, Gary; Porter, Andre; Shippen, Dorothy; Friedman, Katherine L.; Gentry, Matthew S.; Serio, Tricia R.; and Sundquist, Wesley I., "Point of View: What’s in a name?" (2017). Faculty & Staff Scholarship. 1329.
https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/faculty_publications/1329
Source Citation
Schaller, M. D., McDowell, G., Porter, A., Shippen, D., Friedman, K. L., Gentry, M. S., … Sundquist, W. I. (2017). What’s in a name? eLife, 6. https://doi.org/10.7554/elife.32437
Comments
Copyright Schaller et al. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.