Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2015
College/Unit
Eberly College of Arts and Sciences
Department/Program/Center
Philosophy and Humanities
Abstract
This paper is a defense of moral evidentialism, the view that we have a moral obligation to form the doxastic attitude that is best supported by our evidence. I will argue that two popular arguments against moral evidentialism are weak. I will also argue that our commitments to the moral evaluation of actions require us to take doxastic obligations seriously.
Digital Commons Citation
Ryan, Sharon, "In Defense of Moral Evidentialism" (2015). Faculty & Staff Scholarship. 882.
https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/faculty_publications/882
Source Citation
Ryan, Sharon (2015). In Defense of Moral Evidentialism. Logos and Episteme 6 (4):405-427