Eberly College of Arts and Sciences
Philosophy and Humanities
This paper is a defense of moral evidentialism, the view that we have a moral obligation to form the doxastic attitude that is best supported by our evidence. I will argue that two popular arguments against moral evidentialism are weak. I will also argue that our commitments to the moral evaluation of actions require us to take doxastic obligations seriously.
Digital Commons Citation
Ryan, Sharon, "In Defense of Moral Evidentialism" (2015). Faculty & Staff Scholarship. 882.
Ryan, Sharon (2015). In Defense of Moral Evidentialism. Logos and Episteme 6 (4):405-427