Author ORCID Identifier

https://orcid.org/0009-0004-4672-153X

Semester

Summer

Date of Graduation

2025

Document Type

Problem/Project Report

Degree Type

DNP

College

School of Nursing

Department

Anesthesiology

Committee Chair

Aaron Ostrowski

Committee Member

Emily Moore

Committee Member

Eric Likar

Abstract

Problem Statement: Despite the availability of quantitative train of four (TOF) monitoring, anesthesia providers more frequently rely on tactile (qualitative) TOF monitoring, which is associated with underestimation of recovery from muscle relaxation. Inadequate recovery from muscle relaxants results in residual weakness and its associated complications in the postoperative period, including compromised respiratory function (Thilen et al., 2023).

Background: Neuromuscular blockade (NMB) drugs are required to facilitate endotracheal intubation and allow for surgical manipulation. When these drugs are used, train of four (TOF) stimulations are used to monitor and assess the depth and recovery from NMB. TwitchView monitors (quantitative monitoring) is an electronic method that gives a more accurate ratio of the first and fourth twitches which correlates with better recovery from muscle relaxation. Though readily available to all staff, TwitchView monitoring is not used as frequently as tactile TOF monitoring in clinical practice.

Literature Review to Support Planned Intervention: The American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) guidelines support quantitative TOF monitoring as the standard for care (Thilen et al., 2023). The use of quantitative TOF monitors decreases the incidence of residual NMB and respiratory complications in postoperative patients when compared to tactile TOF monitoring (Naguib et al., 2007).

Project Aims: The purpose of this project was to improve compliance with clinical practice guidelines (CPG) of NMB and improve utilization of quantitative NMB monitoring at the project’s clinical site. An analysis of cost-effectiveness of TwitchView monitoring vs. cost of the residual effects of NMB will be performed.

Methods: IHI model for improvement was used along with the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) (AHRQ, 2020) as a framework to implement education and monitor for changes in utilization and compliance with CPG documentation of adequate muscle recovery over three months.

Implementation: Three cycles of the PDSA model were completed monthly using patient chart review for data collection to monitor for changes and areas for improvement.

Evaluation: Data regarding utilization was collected monthly to evaluate by a regression analysis using multinomial logistic models.

Share

COinS