Author ORCID Identifier
Semester
Summer
Date of Graduation
2025
Document Type
Dissertation
Degree Type
PhD
College
Eberly College of Arts and Sciences
Department
Geology and Geography
Committee Chair
Karen Culcasi
Committee Co-Chair
Paolo Davide Farah
Committee Member
Cynthia Gorman
Committee Member
Hasan Karrar
Committee Member
James Sidaway
Abstract
This dissertation explores the discursive and material dimensions of China’s global rise through a case study of the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) in Pakistan. As China becomes a leading provider of development finance, its infrastructure-led approach is reshaping geographies across the Global South. Focusing on the China–Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC)—the BRI’s flagship project—I examine how Chinese and Pakistani actors co-produce development through discourses, infrastructures, and security regimes. Structured around three articles, the dissertation analyzes: (1) the official diplomatic discourses of Chinese state institutions and their reception by Pakistani media outlets; (2) the curated geopolitical discourses of Chinese social media users living in Pakistan on the poverty and lack of development there; and (3) the militarized infrastructures and security regimes embedded in development projects. Drawing on eight months of fieldwork in Pakistan, computational social science, geospatial analysis, and discourse analysis across text, video, and spatial data, I argue that the BRI in Pakistan is co-produced through discursive and material practices, fragmented actors, differentiated geographies, and entangled regimes of development and security.
Recommended Citation
Zoppolato, Davide Giacomo, "Global China in Pakistan: Mixed-Methods Analysis of Symbolic Domination, Social Media Geopolitics, and Security Corridors" (2025). Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports. 13022.
https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/13022
Included in
Geographic Information Sciences Commons, Global Studies Commons, Human Geography Commons, Quantitative, Qualitative, Comparative, and Historical Methodologies Commons