Implications of Variability of Electromyographic Measurements for Assessing Localized Muscle Fatigue
Semester
Spring
Date of Graduation
2020
Document Type
Dissertation
Degree Type
PhD
College
Statler College of Engineering and Mineral Resources
Department
Industrial and Managements Systems Engineering
Committee Chair
Ashish Nimbarte
Committee Member
Anna Allen
Committee Member
Hongwei Hsiao
Committee Member
Gary Winn
Committee Member
Feng Yang
Abstract
The impact of work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) is enormous due to a combination of direct and indirect costs associated with healthcare, lost workdays and human suffering. Because of the established relationship between Localized Muscle Fatigue (LMF) development and WMSDs, and in order to reduce and/or prevent WMSDs in workplaces, different fatigue assessment methods have been developed. Surface Electromyography (SEMG) is a commonly used LMF assessment technique. The SEMG signals are typically analyzed in time and frequency domains to predict LMF based on a relative change with respect to initial, or under no-fatigue conditions. Quantifying such change, however, relies on the assumption that the SEMG measures without fatigue present, under different muscular demands, can serve as an appropriate reference within the joint range-of-motion. To our knowledge, the assumption that the electromyographic measures do not change/vary due to factors other than LMF has not been thoroughly tested. Therefore, the objective of this study was to quantify variability of various SEMG measures in non-fatigued shoulder muscles and its implication for assessing muscle fatigue.
In the first Specific Aim, an experiment was performed to quantify variability of six EMG measures (RMS, MAV, ZC, MnPF, MdPF, and PFB11-22 Hz) in seven non-fatigued shoulder muscles. Twelve human participants performed 120 occupationally relevant static holding tasks. The variability in SEMG data was quantified using Mean Square Error (√MSE) obtained from ANOVA models. The SEMG measures were found to vary between 5.32% to 12.25% due to factors other than muscle fatigue. The narrowest range of variability was observed for ZC (10.20% to 11.00%), and the largest range of variability was observed for MdPF (8.72% to 12.25%).
In the second Specific Aim, a relationship between SEMG variability and LMF based on perceived exertion ratings was studied. Twelve human participants performed 8 fatigue inducing exertions for 10-45 seconds. The data were analyzed to identify muscle fatigue onset based on the perceived exertion ratings and the corresponding relative changes in SEMG measures. A good agreement was observed between the definition of LMF based on perceived exertion ratings and the relative change in the SEMG measures (quantified in Aim 1) for ZC, MnPF, and MdPF. And the study concludes that for the shoulder muscles a change higher than 11.00%, 11.45%, and 12.25% in ZC, MnPF, and MdPF, respectively, can be an indication of LMF.
In conclusion, the study findings suggest that a change higher than 11.00%, 11.45%, and 12.25% in ZC, MnPF, and MdPF, respectively, can be an indication of LMF. These findings could be useful in improving real-time fatigue predication models and/or methods to curtail the incidence of LMF based WMSDs in workplaces.
Recommended Citation
Alasim, Hamad Nasser, "Implications of Variability of Electromyographic Measurements for Assessing Localized Muscle Fatigue" (2020). Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports. 7597.
https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/7597
Included in
Ergonomics Commons, Industrial Engineering Commons, Industrial Technology Commons, Risk Analysis Commons