Author ORCID Identifier

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3548-8846

N/A

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

5-18-2022

College/Unit

College of Education and Human Services

Department/Program/Center

Curriculum & Instruction/Literacy Studies

Abstract

This study examines instructional reasoning in an approximation of practice that simulates a teacher sitting down after class to examine students’ written work. The participants were prompted to attend to, interpret, and decide how to respond to student thinking contained in a piece of written work. Our purpose was to capture the additional cognitive work that teachers engage in. Using qualitative content analysis, we identified the most frequent types of instructional reasoning used by expert teachers just prior to engaging in a responsive deciding action about how to respond. We used the results of our analysis to present three illustrative cases of responsive instructional reasoning.

Source Citation

Lindstrom, D.; Selmer, S. Responsive Teaching and the Instructional Reasoning of Expert Elementary Mathematics Teachers. Educ. Sci. 2022, 12, 350. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12050350

Comments

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

This article received support from the WVU Libraries' Open Access Author Fund.

Included in

Education Commons

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.