Document Type
Book Review
Publication Date
12-12-2019
College/Unit
WVU College of Law
Original Publication Title
JOTWELL
Digital Commons Citation
Lofaso, Anne M., "What’s Good for the Goose is Good for the Gander, Or Is It? The Pitfalls of Using the Court’s Neoliberal Construction of the First Amendment To Protect Secondary Picketing" (2019). Law Faculty Scholarship. 77.
https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/law_faculty/77
Source Citation
Anne Marie Lofaso, What’s Good for the Goose is Good for the Gander, Or Is It? The Pitfalls of Using The Court’s Neoliberal Construction of the First Amendment To Protect Secondary Picketing, JOTWELL (December 13, 2019) (reviewing Richard Blum, Labor Picketing, The Right To Protest, and the Neoliberal First Amendment, 42 N.Y.U. Rev. L. & Soc. Change 595 (2019)), https://worklaw.jotwell.com/whats-good-for-the-goose-is-good-for-the-gander-or-is-it-the-pitfalls-of-using-the-courts-neoliberal-construction-of-the-first-amendment-to-protect-secondary-picketing/.